Sunday, August 19, 2007

DESPICABLE POLITICAL LIARS


DETROIT’S EASTERN MARKET CAFE
EMANCIPATION DAY 2002

The Bocca della Verita is found
in the courtyard of Rome’s Santa Maria in
Cosemedin. Tradition has it that its jaws
will snap shut over the hand of those who
have told lies to others.

Charles “Chuck” Whitehead laid down his copy of the Detroit Free Press, while having a morning coffee with his friend Linden “Turk” Chase. He says — Turk, those damn people causing all this
damn trouble in the world are nothing but motherfucking liars.” Linden: “ You got that right!
That’s what they do for a living. That’s all they know how to do. They think nothing of bombing
the hell out of a country, killing thousands of men, women, and children, then turn around on the evening news and try to tell us that this was all done for the good of the people in that country.
Those motherfuckers never quit with that fucking democracy bullshit.” Harry Segal came over to the table. He says: “Easy you guys, talk like that can get you into a whole lot of trouble. You want to know what these bandits are? They are schlepers, motherfucking schlepers.Underneath those four thousand dollar suits they are still schlepers. If my Bobe was still alive she would have a few choice Jewish or Yiddish words for these fucking shmoks that would turn the air in here blue and cause a minor tremor in Washington. She couldn’t stand the sight of Nixon and threw things at the television set when he was on — so imagine what she would do now. She was a shrewd lady — old-timers still say that she could read a balance sheet in the dark. You know these bastards now have the police power to pick you up off the streets of America, question you, jail you and hold you incommunicado for as long as they like. If they want you they got you— that’s the end of that story.”

Purple Prose: the language used at the Eastern market Café is not intended to shock or offend any reader. This language is used by Black America
to describe those people they see operating in the lowest moral levels of humanity. It was born in a Rite of Passage Ritual known as the Dozens
where young Black men are challenged, under neighborhood street lights and local parks, by their peers with a stream of Verbal Abuse in a test
of their anger endurance and control.

Thursday, August 16, 2007

A SECRET MACHIAVELLIAN DANCE OF DECEPTION

ISRAEL'S ANNUAL ANNUITY AID PROGRAM

To believe that the multifarious love affair between the United States and Israel is a noble ideal
and a mutually benevolent affair designed and choreographed to assist a tiny democratic country
surrounded by hostile enemies on all sides is tantamount to believing in the tooth fairy. Their
mutual goals and ambitions in the Middle East are much grander and greater than this often stated and repeated ideal.

The size and content of Israel’s annual annuity aid program, for yet unstated and still unclear
reasons remains unknown and unpublished. It has been estimated to be in the five to six billion
dollar range of economic and military assistance and appropriations. Clearly an annual drain on
the American budget still not properly understood and recognized by tax paying American
citizens who every four years elect a national government to protect and guide their nation. It is
said that an informed electorate is necessary for a vibrant and progressive democracy. Solitary
voices ask “Why, How much, What for, Who says” in the Senate and the Congress. These voices
in the wilderness are quickly deflected and silenced.. The European press often asks these same
questions, as do the Village and Metro newspapers of America. Again no reply from Washington’s Administration.

Israel is a small country, a very small country: in land size, in population and in its economy. In
many ways it can be compared to a host of second and third class countries. Yet , since its birth
in 1948 it has taken on the international status of a nuclear nation, equipped with the world’s finest and latest military knowhow and equipment. It has a national housing, medical and educational
social infrastructure which rivals that of many more mature industrial nations having greater
populations and much greater gross national production. Other than producing a few agricultural
products for export along with a strong diamond cutting industry, Israel has little else to offer to
the world although it now has some small developments in plastics, scientific equipment,
computer programs, and a textile industry. It has very limited natural resources and its tourist
business has been severely hurt by continuing acts of internal civil strife and civilian bombings
and deaths in its major cities. So how did it achieve the international status it now possesses ?
That question can only be answered by the citizens of Great Britain and the United States of
America whose politicians have established and supported the State of Israel and now endow its
existence annually with financial and military assistance and support programs. Ultimately the
question must be answered also by the citizens of the world through their United Nations
representatives.

Sunday, August 12, 2007

A CANADIAN NATIONAL HOCKEY LEAGUE OF OUR OWN

THE TIME IS NOW
CANADA’S OWN NATIONAL HOCKEY LEAGUE
RECENT HEADLINES
ESPN.com quotes a series of e-mail excerpts between Leipold and Rodier that seem to indicate Bettman was against Balsillie's owning the Predators, long before the co-chief executive officer of Research in Motion acquired the lease for the Copps Coliseum in Hamilton and held a drive for season tickets.
Those two pre-emptive actions by Balsillie are cited often by NHL sources as the reasons for the league cooling on him as a potential owner, even though its executive council approved him last fall when he wanted to buy the Pittsburgh Penguins.
According to ESPN.com, in early May, nearly three weeks before Leipold announced he had an agreement in principle to sell the team to Balsillie, both Rodier and Leipold made reference in e-mail correspondence to Bettman's "cease and desist" order. In an e-mail message dated May 4, Leipold writes, "I would say the cease and desist order is still in play."
NHL spokesman Gary Meagher said Friday "the commissioner never ordered a cease-and-desist order to Mr. Leipold."
In e-mail dated May 3, Leipold wrote that he "needed time to smooth things over" with Bettman, according to ESPN.com. Rodier subsequently asks Leipold, "Will you be talking to Gary to calm him down some more?"
Leipold eventually went ahead and announced an agreement in principle on May 23 to sell the team to Balsillie for $238-million (all currency U.S.).
Shortly thereafter, Balsillie obtained the lease for the Copps Coliseum and took season-ticket and suite deposits in Hamilton, actions aimed at satisfying requirements in the NHL's constitution pertaining to relocation.
But it is another area of the constitution that may have made Bettman cool to the idea of a franchise in Hamilton.
Section 4.3 seems to indicate that any team can veto the move of another into its territory, meaning that the Toronto Maple Leafs would be able to block a franchise move into Hamilton with a single vote against.
"No franchise shall be granted for a home territory within the home territory of a member without the written consent of such member," the constitution states.
However, the NHL insists that that is not the case, citing bylaw 36.4, subsection C, which states that a simple majority vote would allow any team to move. That bylaw, however, applies only when the league is advised by counsel that its constitution may be unlawful regarding franchise relocation.
Several sources have suggested the NHL does not want a test case that would
THE SOLUTION
For the few or the many who may be interested and would like to consider what course of action can be adopted nation wide as being sound, feasible and especially needed to assure that Canada will soon retrieve its former hockey glories and international status, there are two main proposals and possibilities to consider. Adopting these changes may be the starting point of a new era, a new format of hockey excellence, for our players, our fans, the nation and our financial establishment.
First, the formation of a Canadian National Hockey League --secondly the reestablishment of the Stanley Cup as our symbol of our National Hockey Champions.
Is such an idea possible, practical, conceivably or unsound and contentious? It depends on how one looks at it and the needs that exist. Other than banking and politics Canada no longer has a defining national industry. It has a few companies working successfully in the industries of other countries and in the world of international trade and industry, but not one singular Canadian industry to call our own and profit from. So the national need exists for a significant hockey program which will once again restore our international status in the most Canadian of all worldwide athletic enterprises.
The needed cities are there, the hockey talent is there, the money for franchises is there. All player contracts will provide for payment in Canadian Dollars. There are enough fans paying enough money presently for NHL games in Canada, to support successfully an entirely Canadian enterprise as our own professional hockey league. Our Canadian Junior hockey leagues turn out a couple hundred hockey players a year. Europe does the same. If European countries can support their own hockey leagues, Canada should be able to do so also. Presently there are National hockey leagues in the Czech Republic, Germany, Switzerland, Belarus, Slovakia, Finland, Austria, Japan, Sweden, Latvia, the Ukraine, Russia, Italy and Norway. There are two hundred and eighty European hockey players, 28 percent of the leagues' total employed presently by NHL teams. Approximately six hundred and fifty Canadian born hockey players earn their living playing in the NHL. These players were born and raised in Canada and played their minor and junior hockey for cities and towns across the country. Canadians and expatriated Canadians make up the great majority of the managers, coaches, and supervisors of the hockey and business affairs of the National Hockey League league and its franchised member teams.
IT IS TIME TO BRING LORD STANLEY HOME
There are twenty-four American cities with NHL franchise teams ; Canada has six franchise teams. These odds make it very difficult for Canadians across the country to see the day when Canada will once again celebrate a Stanley Cup championship. Lord Stanley's trophy of hockey excellence and superiority in Canada, donated in 1893, is now more at home south of the border. The National Hockey League began in 1917 as a Canadian enterprise with headquarters in Montreal, Quebec and remained that way until the election of John A. Ziegler, Jr. of Grosse Pointe, Michigan (Detroit) as the League’s President in 1977 who the made the NHL a American Corporation and centered its headquarters in New York City.

Sunday, July 22, 2007

FOR PEOPLE WHO DO NOT READ HISTORY BOOKS

OPEN LETTER TO PEOPLE INTERESTED IN ITALIAN HISTORY WHO DO NOT READ HISTORY BOOKS

If you consider yourself to be Italian, by birth, marriage, or heritage, but find yourself living most or all of your life outside of Italy as first, second and third generation sons and daughters of Italian Immigrants in the many lands in which these brave, proud and very enterprising people settled in during the past two hundred years, (14,000 Italians immigrants came to America in 1820-1860) and know very little about the recent war history of Italy, or someone simply interested in Italy and its history, then this important message is for you:

YOU HAVE BEEN LIED TO

You have been told ever since 1945, by every media means known and available to the authors of these slanderous lies , that Italy and its people were forced to live their lives for twenty-one years under a political regime of a very evil, corrupt and vain dictatorship, and that finally in 1943 Italy was invaded by the Allied Armies of America, Canada, Britain, Australia, and others and freed and liberated from this period of Fascist terror and crime, and that the Italian Prime Minister of Italy, from 1922 to 1943 was assassinated by “patriots” and his body and others were hung and desecrated in a public space in Milan , a ruthless display of civic brutality of now seen and known to the entire world, by sixty years of publication in films and photos, as a just award for a man who caused the enormous suffering and atrocities of the Italian people for the last two years of the war in Europe.

HOW CAN I PROVE TO YOU THAT THIS IS ALL A FABRICATION OF LIES AND DISINFORMATION?

As an author of two books on the life and times of Benito Mussolini written in the past ten years I now see that the vast majority of people do not read history books, but rather get their important ideas about war and its causes via television, radio talk shows, films, newspapers and magazines. These can be weapons of mass misinformation and have become the new learning centers for millions around the world and especially here at home.
The truth is I can prove to you in my two books that the normal everyday media historical information about the life of this Italian Prime Minister is bogus information from start to finish. Google alone has a million and a half search items available when a search for Mussolini is initiated. Each page of items presents a menu of pro and con points of view regarding these war years of 1940 to 1945, and very little to say about Mussolini’s Italian political, economic, social, religious and cultural progress in the years from 1922 to 1939

So then what is to be done?

First, read carefully the now famous words of Richard Washburn Child. United States Ambassador to Italy in 1928, written as an introduction to an autobiography of Benito Mussolini, after his first six years as the Prime Minister of Italy. I have provided a copy of this now historically important Introduction Document for your examination

FOREWARD

By Richard Washburn Child

It is far from my purpose to elaborate the material in this book, to interpret it, or to add to it.
With much of the drama it contains I, being Ambassador of the United States at the time, was
intimately familiar; much of the extraordinary personality disclosed here was an open book to
me long ago because I knew well the man who now, at last, has written characteristically,
directly and simply, of that self for which I have a deep affection.
For his autobiography I am responsible. Lives of Mussolini written by others have interests of
sorts.
“But nothing can take the place of a book which you will write yourself,” I said to him.
“Write myself?” He leaned across his desk and repeated my phrase in amazement.
He is the busiest single individual in the world. He appeared hurt as if a friend had failed to
understand.
“Yes,” I said and showed him a series of headings I had written on a few sheets of paper.
“All right,” he said in English. “I will.”
It was quite like him. He decides quickly and completely.
So he began. He dictated. I advised that method because when he attempts to write in longhand
he corrects and corrects and corrects. It would have been too much for him. So he dictated. The
copy came back and he interlined the manuscript in his own hand – a dash of red pencil, and a
flowing rivulet of ink – here and there.
When the manuscripts began to come to me I was troubled because mere literal translators lose
the vigor of the man himself.
“What editing may I do?” I asked him.
“Anything you like,” he said.” You know Italy, you understand Fascism, you see me clearly as
any one.”

But there was nothing much to do. The story came through as it appears here. It is all his and –
- what luck for all of us – so like him! Approve of him or not, when one reads this book
one may know Mussolini or at least, if one’s vision is clouded, know him better. Like the
book or not, there is not an insincere line in it. I find none.
Of course there are many things which a man writing an autobiography cannot see about
himself or will not say about himself.
He is unlikely to speak of his own size on the screen of history.
Perhaps when approval or disapproval, theories and isms, pro and cons, are all put aside the
only true measure of a man’s greatness from a wholly unpartisan view-point may be found in
the answer to the question:
“How deep and lasting has been the effect of a man upon the largest number of human beings
-- their hearts, their thoughts, their material welfare, their relation to the universe?”
In our time it may be shrewdly forecast that no man will exhibit dimensions of permanent
greatness equal to those of Mussolini.
Admire him or not, approve his philosophies or not, concede the permanence of his success or
not, consider him superman or not, as you may, he has put to a working test, on great and
growing numbers of mankind, programmes, unknown before, in applied spirituality, in applied
plans, in applied leadership, in applied doctrines, in the applied principle that contents are
more important than labels on bottles. He has not only been able to secure and hold an almost
universal following; he has built a new state upon a new concept of a state. He has not only
been able to change the lives of human beings but he has changed their minds, their hearts,
their spirits. He has not merely ruled a house; he has built a new house.
He has not merely put it on paper or into orations; he has laid the bricks. It is one thing to
administer a state. The one who does this well is called a statesman. It is quite another thing to
make a state. This is super statesmanship. I knew him well before the world at large, outside of
Italy, had ever heard of him; I knew him before and after the moment he leaped into the saddle
and in the days when he, almost single-handed, was clearing away chaos’ own junk pile from
Italy. But no man knows Mussolini. An Italian newspaper offered a prize for the best essay
showing insight into the mystery of the man. Mussolini, so the story goes, stopped the contest by
writing to the paper that such a competition was absurd. Because he himself could not enter an
opinion.
In spite of quick, firm decisions, in spite of grim determination, in spite of well-ordered
diagrammed pattern and plan of action fitted to any moment of time, Mussolini, first of all,
above all and after all, is a personality always in a state of flux, adjusting its leadership to a
world eternally in a state of flux.
Change the facts upon which Mussolini has acted and he will change his action. Change the
hypotheses and he will change his conclusion.
And this perhaps is an attribute of greatness seldom recognized. Most of us are forever hoping
to put our world in order and finish the job. Statesmen with some idea to make over into reality
hope for a day when they can say: “Well, that’s done!” And when it is done – often enough it is
nothing. The bridges they have built are now useless, because the rivers have all changed their
courses and humanity is already shrieking for new bridges. This is not an unhappy thought,
says Mussolini. A finished world would be a stupid place – intolerably stupid.

The imagination of mere statesmen covers a static world.
The imagination of true greatness covers a dynamic world. Mussolini conceives a dynamic
world. He is ready to go on the march with it, though it overturns all his structures, upsets his
theories, destroys all of yesterday and creates a screaming dawn of tomorrow.
Opportunist is a term of reproach used to brand men who fit themselves to conditions for
reasons of self-interest. Mussolini, as I have learned to know him, is an opportunist in the sense
that he believes that mankind itself must be fitted to changing conditions rather than to fixed
theories, no matter how many hopes and prayers have been expended on theories and
programmes.
He has marched up several hills with the thousands and then marched down again. This
strange creature of strange life and strange thoughts, with that almost psychopathic fire which
is in saints and villains, in Napoleons, in Jeanne d’Arcs, and in Tolstoy, in religious prophets
and in Ingersolls, has been up the Socialist, the international, the liberal, and the conservative
hills and down again. He says: ”The sanctity of an ism is not in the ism; it has no sanctity
beyond its power to do, to work, to succeed in practice. Failed yesterday and succeed tomorrow.
The machine first of all must run!”
I have watched, with a curiosity that has never failed to creep in on me, the marked
peculiarities, physical and mental, of this man. At moments he is quite relaxed, at ease; and yet
the unkown gusts of his own personality play on him eternally. One sees in his eyes, or in a
quick movement of his body, or in a sentence suddenly ejaculated, the effect of these gusts, just
as one sees wind on the surface of the water.
There is in his walk something of a prowl, a faint suggestion of the tread of the cat. He likes
cats – their independence, their decision, their sense of justice and their appreciation of the
sanctity of the individual. He even likes lions and lionesses, and plays with until those who
guard his life protest against their social set. His principal pet is a Persian feline which, being
of aristocratic lineage, nevertheless exhibits a pride not only of ancestry but, condescendingly,
of belonging to Mussolini. And yet, in spite of his own prowl, as he walks along in his riding
boots, springy, active, ready to leap, it seems, there is little else feline about him. One quality is
feline, however – it is the sense of his complete isolation.
One feels that he must always have had this isolation as a boy, isolation as a young radical,
adventurer, lover, worker, thinker.
There is no understudy of Mussolini. There is no man, woman, or child who stands anywhere in
the inner orbit of his personality. No one. The only possible exception is his daughter Edda. All
the tales of his alliances, his obligations, his ties, his predilections are arrant nonsense. There
are none – no ties, no public predilections, no alliances, no obligations unpaid.
Financially? Whom could he owe? He has made and can unmake them all. He is free to test
every officeholder in the whole of Italy by the yardstick of service and fitness. Beyond that I
know not one political debt that he owes. He has tried to pay those of the past; I believe that
the cynicism in him is based upon the failure of some who have been rewarded to live up to the
trust put in them.

“But I take the responsibility for all,” says he. He says it publicly with jaws firm; he
says it privately with eyes somewhat saddened.
He takes responsibility for everything – for discipline, for censorship, for measures which, were
less rigor required, would appear repressive and cruel. “Mine!” says he, and stands or falls on
that. It is an admirable courage. I could, if I wished, quote instance after instance of this
acceptance – sometimes when he is not to blame–of the whole responsibility of the machine.
“Mine!” says he.
And in spite of any disillusionment he has suffered since I knew him first, he has retained his
laugh – often, one is bound to say, a scornful laugh – and he has kept his faith in an ability to
build up a machine – the machine of Fascism – the machine built not on any fixed theory but
one intended by Mussolini to run –above all, to run, to function, to do, to accomplish, to fill the
bottles with wine first, unlike the other isms, and put on labels after.
Mussolini has superstitious faith in himself. He has said it. Not a faith in himself to make
personal gain. An assassin’s bullet might wipe him out and leave his family in poverty. That
would be that. His faith is in a kind of destiny which will allow him, before the last chapter, to
finish the building of this new state, this new machine –”the machine which will run and has a
soul.”
The first time I ever saw him he came to my residence sometime before the march on Rome and
I asked him what would be his programme for Italy. His answer was immediate: “Work and
discipline.”
I remember I thought at that time that the phrase sounded a little evangelical, a phrase of
exhortation. But a mere demagogue would never chose it. Wilson’s slogan of Rights and Peace
and Freedom are much more popular and gain easier currency than sterner phrases. It is easier
even for a sincere preacher, to offer soft nests to one’s followers; it is more difficult to excite
enthusiasm for stand-up doctrines. Any analyses and weighing of Mussolini’s greatness must
include recognition that he has made popular throughout a race of people, and perhaps for
others, a standard of obligation of the individual not only exacting but one which in the end will
be accepted voluntarily. Not only is it accepted voluntarily but with an almost spiritual ecstasy
which was held up miraculously in Italy during years, when all the so-called liberals in the
world were hovering over it like vultures, croaking that if it were not dead it was about to die.
It is difficult to lead men at all. It is still more difficult to lead them away from self indulgence.
It is still more difficult to lead them so that a new generation, so that youth itself, appears as if
born with a new spirit, a new virility bred in the bones. It is difficult to govern a state and
difficult to deal cleanly and strongly with a static programme applied to a static world; but it is
more difficult to build a new state and deal cleanly and strongly with a dynamic programme
applied to a dynamic world.

A MAN BORN TO SAVE ITALY

These laudatory well chosen words by Mr., Richard W. Child, and Ambassador of one of the world’s newest and most important nation on the European scene seemed to ignite a furor of admiration and praise for both Italy and its new Prime Minister. Thousands of people around the world became Mussolini admirers along with a long line of important world leaders daily making their way to visit Rome to see who and talk with this new young Prime Minister to learn what made this man the highest ranking politician amongst all the leaders of the western world.

When Benito Mussolini became the Prime Minister of Italy in 1922 Italy was a broken, bankrupt country that had suffered great losses of young Italian soldiers fighting in Northern Italy in the war of 1914 to 1918 and had all the promises made by their allies the British and the French taken away by the Treaty of Versailles. Italy was destitute and found itself as a country without any hope or promise of a brighter future. Mussolini in a few short years changed that beak national reality to one of hope and promise for both the country and the Italian people. They now had a man of action and political genius to lead them out of that state of despair that was felt in every region and province of the country. For this new leadership they named him Il Duce, the leader, teacher and law giver.

Mussolini, now only 37 years old, was now on the minds of every government in the western world of nations .Italy rejoiced at his every success, but these proved to be troublesome for those nations that up until 1922 had their own way of operation and saw his energy, drive and ambitions for the Italian people as a direct threat to their plans for the world. Indeed, they had another war in mind for the past ten years and were shocked at the speed and efficiency of Italy’s recovery from despair and the progress made under the leadership of this new dynamic man called Il Duce.

SO THE PROPAGANDA MACHINE WAS SET IN MOTION IN LONDON, PARIS, WASHINGTON, AND MOSCOW FROM WHICH A VIRTUAL TORRENT OF LIES AND FALSEHOODS POURED FORTH FROM THESE GOVERNMENTS VIA VARIOUS MEDIA AGENCIES.

These vicious attacks on Italy, Fascism, and the Prime Minister were orchestrated initially from London the products of Lord Louis Mountbatten, Sir. Anthony Eden, Lord Robert Cecil. Winston Churchill admired Benito Mussolini but as an astute factotum became the front man for this British program of an all out assault against Italy and Fascism. Communists, Marxists, Zionists, Freemasons, Capitalists and Liberals all joined in at various periods of this 1939 political world with their vile messages of anti-fascist propaganda. They all knew that Italy was becoming a whole new nation with this new Fascist concept of governing a nation and did not want to see it survive and grow on its own merits: They were determined to have another war and had their war, which took the lives of sixty million people in six short years.

Much is known but little is said or published of the major role played by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt of the United States and his very important moneyed Zionist minded friends in the U.S.A. Under a cloak of neutrality, this president and his coterie of bankers and industrialists had their dirty hands in every one of the early stages of international diplomacy which eventually led to the outbreak of war in Europe on September, 3, 1939.

IN SUMMATION

The Allied military presence in Italy began with the invasion of Sicily on July 10, 1943 when Mussolini was no longer Prime Minister. His successors, as arranged by agreement with the Allied Forces, all left Italy for other lands and left the nation and its people to a period of absolute social, political, economic and military confusion and suffering.

They marched and bombed their way northward through the entire peninsula and then eventually took over the government and control of the nation in Rome on June 4, 1944.

And bombed they did. They bombed most of the major cities and industrial sites from Naples to Milan as they wished, destroying much of Italy’s historically important sites and regions including parts of Rome. Their excessive and now seen as unnecessary bombing raids was a military/political program of callous revenge, terrorist bombings on a country and a people who had no army, no government and no will to continue the war. The tragedy of bombing of Monte Casino stands out as a classic example of the gratuitous Allied bombing strategy.





IF THESE CHAOTIC DAYS OF CIVIL STRIFE AND CONFUSION ALONG WITH THE COMPLETE COLLAPSE OF ALL GOVERNMENTAL ORDER AND ASSISTANCE ALONG WITH A LEGACY OF FOOD SHORTAGES AND STARVATION ARE THE DAYS THAT YOUR GRANDFATHER, OR YOUR FATHER OR MOTHER, OR GREAT UNCLE OR AUNT RECALL AND BLAME IT ALL ON THE SHOULDERS OF BENITO MUSSOLINI, THEY ARE MAKING A MISTAKE, ALTHOUGH HE PAID THE ULTIMATE PRICE OF A PATRIOTIC MARTYRDOM, HE WAS INNOCENT OF THESE LAST DAYS OF NATIONAL SOCIAL, ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL CHAOS, DOUBLE DEALINGS, TREACHERY. VINDICTIVENESS AND DIVERSE POLITICAL AND MILITARY COMMANDS WHICH WERE THE ORDER OF THE DAY.

This landing in Italy was not a day of liberation, as is celebrated each year, but rather an Invasion of Occupation. They, the Americans are still there; in the Italian Constitution, in three military bases and especially in NATO of which Italy is a member. It is unknown if this was a political choice or an obligation of all post war governments of Italy.


p.s. If you read Italian please visit: Arch. Filippo Giannini at http://www.filippogiannini.it/ Author of important Books and Articles on life of Benito Mussolini

copyright July 27, 2007 R.S.Daldin, Windsor, Ontario, Canada

Sunday, July 15, 2007

66 YOUNG CANADIAN SOLDIERS DIE

66 YOUNG CANADIAN SOLDIERS DIE IN AFGHANISTAN WAR

WHAT IS THE PROBLEM – WHAT IS THE GOAL –WHAT IS THE PRIZE

Britain began a series of wars in this far off land nearly 200 years ago (1839-1842) (1878-1880) and were eventually sent packing by a fierce band of native tribal warriors
Russia also invaded this remote, mountainous country in 1979 with tens of thousands of troops equipped with modern weapons of war and were also driven out of the country by these same national tribal warriors in 1989.

The United States boycotted the Russian 1980 Olympics as a protest against this invasion, and then in league with Britain in October, 2001 the USA began an intense bombing campaign in Afghanistan, supposedly looking for one solitary man they believed to be hiding in one of their mountain areas.

Today, a NATO International Security Force (SAF a collection of allied nations) is carrying on this doomed attempt to “westernize” the people of this region of the world and to mount an assault all their social and religious beliefs.

Afghanistan’s President, Hamid Karzai, has been showered with billions of US dollars since this new invasion began and today he stands by idly while thousands of his civilian population is being murdered as a result of this on going “War on Terror.”

Friday, July 13, 2007

When Will The USA Leave Iraq?


At a Press Conference July 12 President George W. Bush answered several dozen questions about his plans for a withdrawal of American Troops from Iraq. He dodged them all with his now standard replies knowing fully well that the USA will never consider any timetable of withdrawal for their occupation of Iraq as this complete and total occupation of Iraq was the real motive for their military attack on Iraq and is only the first step in the birth of establishing a military, economic and political beach head for the reasons seen below:

WHY THE INVASION?

Upon closer inspection it will be seen that the State and the Governments of Israel are not Judaic
nor does the State follow and believe in and observe the ancient beliefs and practices of Judaic
Law. Israel is a secular state. It is a modern Anglo-American- Zionist State given over to a goal
of global political influence and economic power and domination. The State of Israel is their
beachhead to the entire Middle East.
THEY NEVER LEAVE
Today they remain and maintain multiple military bases in Italy, Germany, Japan, and even a small military base in Great Britain. They now have over 1000 military bases and installations covering the entire globe.

Tuesday, May 29, 2007

WHAT IS ITALIAN FASCISM

FASCISM -- WHAT IS IT?

What was it then - what is it now!

Fascism was born in Italy in 1917, especially in the young mind of Benito Mussolini, upon his return home as a wounded veteran from the trench-warfare of World War One experience. He and 145 other Veterans gathered together in a small hall in Milano on March 23, of 1919 and as a result formed a veteran’s association known in the Italian language as the Fasci di Combattimento. They and the rest of the Italian Army had fought gallantly in the war, along with their allies the British and the French armies and lost many precious young Italian lives to the war which raged in the Northern mountains of Italy and as a result were promised many post-war rewards for themselves and the Italian Nation as the victors against the German- Austrian Empire. At the Conference of Paris in 1918 they, along with the Italian people, found out the reality that they were not to share in any of the Italian territorial fruits of victory, but instead were to lose former Italian cities and territories in the new political arrangements then announced and established by the main Treaty political powers -- Britain, Russia and France. Italy and Italians now felt betrayed by their former Allies

Fascism was given a prominent role to play in Italian National life due mainly to the war’s devastation upon their land and the nation’s pride After the war the country was suffering from many ills. A host of economic and social problems were apparent in every region of the country. The nation was exhausted by sacrifice, having suffered nearly two million casualties, far greater than anyone had anticipated, and its citizens now faced severe food shortages and disastrous levels of unemployment. Most importantly Fascism became their defender in the many street battles which then raged in their cities and towns of Italy between these war veterans and members of Italy’s Communist party. The country faced the very real danger of becoming another European Communist State under the authority of the new and powerful influence of the Russian Communist International program led by Joseph Stalin and others.

Fascism is a product of the Italian People -- it is as Italian in nature as is Italian grand opera, architecture, art, literature, science, religion, culture and industry. It is not course and brutal but is as intellectual and refined as were the many social glories and civilized qualities of the former golden age of the Italian Renaissance and its many human benefits bestowed upon the world in general.

FASCISM IS A PRODUCT OF THE ITALIAN PEOPLE AND THE ITALIAN ANSWER TO ITALIAN NEED

As Italian Fascist social and economic political successes grew and were being seen and admired and even copied by other nations of the world, Fascism was judged to be too intellectual and dangerous for certain Western nations to comprehend and control. These nations began to gather, as vultures do, to attack and defeat by propaganda every premise, every ideology, every program and every institution of this new social order in Italy. After all, it was they who were running the political affairs of the world, not this young, peasant born, brash upstart in Italy. The Italian people were fortunate enough to have this young brave political genius born into their midst in 1883 in the small hamlet of Predappio, Italy.

Typical of the news from England is the following 1936 report from the Italian Embassy in London: “ The British Liberals, Labourites, etc., especially the latter, are a conglomerate of fanatics, necessarily anti-Fascist, who represent what I call the “historic beast” of England. They are the same fanatics who six centuries ago burned Joan of Arc and four centuries ago beheaded Mary Stuart and later Charles I. Not for nothing was Mary Stuart’s executioner an ancestor of the Cecil family, of which Lord Cecil is the last notorious descendant. A year ago the “beast” almost got the upper hand. But it did not succeed in dragging the British people into a crusade against Italy, although it managed to drag the Baldwin Government… . Anti-Fascist fanaticism had made them (the Labour Party) accept the Conservative’s rearmament programme not as a necessity of defence but as a means of defence against the Fascist threat.”And now what has it become in today’s world. Fascism in its lower case spelling fascism has become a convenient term to label and describe anyone one or any government in the past as being mean-spirited or a part of a brutal totalitarian regime. It is pinned on whomever, whenever or wherever a writer or a government spokesman wishes to malign a person or a government having no affiliation with any Italian connection either presently or in the past. It is a sign of literary and or intellectual laziness or a predisposed need to continue the hateful assault on the Italian people, Benito Mussolini or the Italian Fascist Government that governed Italy from 1922 to 1943 in the fear that another Il Duce may one day be seen on the political scene. It has become the main media weapon favoured by a phalanx of modern media commentators of all stripes when they wish to demean and demonize anything that does not have the favour and approval of the world’s new breed of Internationalists.

Oxford’s Latin Dictionary has this to say “ fascis, is , m. bundle, parcel; fasces, pl. bundles of rods, carried before the highest magistrates of Rome, usually with an axe bound up in the middle of them; the power or office of a magistrate.

A rebirth, or a renaissance of Benito Mussolini’s concept of a prosperous well governed State, in its truest Italian form, still scares the daylights out of today’s main centres of political power and influence, and as such these vicious attacks against the person and the programs, institutions and government of Mussolini must continue and be maintained at all costs. The political and social Italian ideas of Il Duce are still too intellectual, too fundamental and too powerful for most Western minds to comprehend or deal with.
The Persistence Of Fascism is remarkably analogous to the age old chronicles of the Persistence of Roman- Italian Catholicism, the timeless Italian Renaissance, the poignant dramatic passions of Italian Opera, the radiant illumination of Italian Culture with its myriad expressions of genius, charm, fascination, and international admiration.